Starmer orders review of Britain’s ‘hollowed out’ armed forces

Keir Starmer has asked for a thorough “root and branch” assessment of the state of Britain’s military capabilities, left “hollowed out” during 14 years of Tory rule, as the country faces a dangerous and uncertain world, the government has announced.

A new strategic defence review, launched by Labour in its second week of power, will be a radical departure from the ones which have taken place before by bringing in senior public figures from outside Whitehall to shape defence and geopolitical strategies in the coming years.

Lord Robertson of Port Ellen, the former defence secretary and Nato secretary general, will lead a team with General Sir Richard Barrons, former head of Joint Forces Command and deputy chief of the Defence Staff, and Fiona Hill, a foreign policy specialist and former advisor to a US President.

Announcing the review, Starmer is due to say in the Commons on Tuesday: “ We live in a more dangerous and volatile world…. I promised the British people I would deliver the change needed to take our country forward, and I promised action not words.

“That’s why one of my first acts since taking office is to launch our strategic defence review. We will make sure our hollowed out armed forces are bolstered and respected, that defence spending is responsibly increased, and that our country has the capabilities needed to ensure the UK’s resilience for the long term.”

Lord Robertson’s reviewers will be supported by a defence review team and hear the views of current and former members of the armed forces, Nato personnel, politicians, journalists, academics and members of the public in a far-reaching study lasting a year before a report is produced.

Defence secretary John Healey, who will oversee the review, insisted that it will have full scope to put forward innovative, iconoclastic plans and policies, use lessons learned from Ukraine and other recent wars to bring changes to the UK military, and challenge entrenched, vested interest present among some in the security hierarchy.

“There will be little point in getting together this formidable team to lead the review if we are going to shut them up and their ability to do that [challenge traditional precepts]. It is quite right to learn from emerging conflicts, assess what potentially hostile countries are doing.

“We are ready to do more with new technology, ready to support Ukraine with things which have been demonstrated in Ukraine,” Mr Healey said.

“At the start of a new era for Britain, we need a new era for defence. The review will strengthen the foundations for this new mission-driven government… Our armed forces need to be better ready to fight, more integrated and more innovative. We need clearer accountability, faster delivery, less waste and better value for money. The review will ensure that defence is central to the future security of Britain and to its economic growth and prosperity.”

Lord Robertson, who was widely praised by Nato allies during his time as secretary general, said: “ I think there’s an appetite for some really fresh thinking about how we’re going to protect the British people from the kind of threats that we faced in the world today.

“The world is a more dangerous place and to combat the evolving threat we need a new approach. We also will need a new type of review, which delivers quickly but also includes the views and voices of those from all parties, all parts of the defence family and a spectrum of our partners and allies.”

A record number of former military personnel, who have recently left the services, have been elected as Labour MPs in the election, bringing with them recent experience of the evolving nature of combat. They include Colonel Alistair Carne, a Royal Marine awarded the Military Cross for missions undertaken in Afghanistan, who was made veterans minister on his first day in parliament.

Sir Keir has pledged to keep Trident as part of a “nuclear deterrent triple lock”; to place Nato at the centre of military strategy; to continue to provide Ukraine with armed support; and to boost defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP once the economy allows. Labour says this shows how far the party has moved on from the time of Jeremy Corbyn, who opposed maintaining Trident and was frequently critical of Nato.

While ensuring homeland security, the review will ensure that the UK has the capabilities for supporting Ukraine as long as necessary in the war against Russia. It will also set out ways to further strengthen ties to the Indo Pacific , the Gulf and the Middle East.

The UK, meanwhile, remains committed to the delivery of the AUKUS partnership with the US and Australia.

However, Labour’s stance on waiting for the economy to improve before seeking to meet the 2.5 per cent target has drawn criticism. Lord West, the former head of the Royal Navy and a Labour peer, said: “I think we ought to say when we are going to get to 2.5 per cent. ‘When the situation allows’ is not really good enough – Putin will not wait for our situation to be good enough before he attacks.”

Furthermore, Britain’s defence spending has been repeatedly cut by previous governments, while other Nato states have made substantial increases. Germany’s 2024 defence budget is now bigger than Britain’s for the first time since the Second World War, at £77.5bn compared with £63.9bn.

As a result, “large parts of the UK’s armed forces lack the critical enablers, munitions, and maintenance capabilities they need to be match-fit for Nato’s front line against Russia”, says Malcolm Chalmers, deputy director general of think tank RUSI.

Spending on Britain’s own conventional forces has not risen in real terms since 2022. What is needed, Chalmers adds, “is a guarantee of steady and substantial real-term growth each year for a decade or more”.